Legal Opinion

Garvy v. Wilder

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided March 27, 1941No. 7451PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EVANS, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff relies chiefly on Casey v. Galli, 94 U.S. 673, 24 L.Ed. 168. He also asserts that a statutory bank stock liability is contractual in nature and that the Illinois statrtte provides (R.S. ’39, Chap. 74, Sec. 2) for accrual of interest at 5% on liquidation of accounts and that the declaration of an assessment’s due date is the equivalent of the settlement of accounts.

Appellees contend that the Federal statutory obligation for a national bank assessment does not draw interest; that no action may be maintained for interest where the principal has been satisfied by…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Casey v. GalliSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Rawlings v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. McClaine v. RankinSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  5. Bowden v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1883

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Abell v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1945
  2. Hummel v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1945
  3. Reconstruction Finance Corporation v. GoldbergCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API