Legal Opinion
Ephriam (Dov) Goldstein, et al. v. Karl Hindle
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided January 8, 2026No. 1:21-cv-03124Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND EPHRIAM (DOV) GOLDSTEIN, et al., * Plaintiffs, * v. * Civil Action No. CJC-21-3124 KARL HINDLE, * Defendant. * MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter is before the Court on two motions. The first is a Motion for Summary Judgment and Motion to Dismiss Defendant’s Counterclaims with Prejudice filed by Plaintiffs Ephriam (Dov) Goldstein, Ronald Layman, and Earl Morrissey (the “Motion”). ECF No. 141. The second is a Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant Karl Hindle(the “Cross- Motion”). ECF No. 143. The parties have filed responses to the…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Ronald K. Drewitt v. Fred L. Pratt Pizza Hut of America, Inc., City of Norfolk, Party-In-InterestCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
- Rossignol v. VoorhaarCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.