Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Fisher v. Wright

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1942No. 6421Published

1ConcurrenceWolfe, Justice

I concur. The result in this case seems inevitable despite the unfortunate position in which Mr. Fisher finds himself. He has purchased land at a tax sale and finds he has acquired no title. In a former suit by the Wrights to quiet title against Fisher, the latter after two amended affirmative answers claiming title in him by virtue of a tax deed, filed a third amended answer in which in effect he confessed the weakness of his tax title and asked for reimbursement for money paid to the county for taxes, interest and penalties. It is alleged that the Wrights then stipulated that their action…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Holland v. HotchkissCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Coughlin v. City of PierreSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Sorensen v. BillsUtah Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Shipp v. SheffieldUtah Supreme Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API