Legal Opinion

Hill v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 1974PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CHATTIN, Judge.

Appellant, as surviving wife and dependent, brought this action seeking an award under the Workmen’s Compensation Act for the death of her husband, Bluford Hill.

Appellant, in her complaint, alleged that on March 15, 1973, her husband was an employee of Path Manufacturing Company in Sparta; that he was employed by the Company as a night watchman; and that while at work on that date he was crushed to death due to the collapse of the building in which he was working during the presence of a tornado.

Appellee responded that the injury and death did not arise out of or in the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jackson v. Clark & Fay, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Knox v. BatsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Mason-Dixon Lines, Inc. v. LettTennessee Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Threet v. CoxTennessee Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Oman Construction Company v. HodgeTennessee Supreme Court · 1959

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Woods v. WarrenTennessee Supreme Court · 1977
  2. International Yarn Corp. v. CassonTennessee Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Dixon v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Hall v. Auburntown Industries, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Brett Rosasco v. West Knoxville Painters, LLCTennessee Supreme Court · 2021

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API