St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. Love
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANSING, Judge.
Mary Adams and Dr. Richard Adams 1 appeal a summary judgment in a declaratory action brought to determine coverage under a professional liability policy. The trial court held that alleged malpractice, which included the psychologist's sexual involvement with Mary Adams, was not part of the professional treatment and not covered by the policy. Because the undisputed affidavit of the sole expert witness supports the Adamses’ contention that a number of the alleged acts of negligence arose within the counseling relationship, we reverse the summary judgment precluding…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Iowa Kemper Insurance Co. v. StoneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Jerrie M. Simmons v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Zipkin v. FreemanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
- Associated Independent Dealers, Inc. v. Mutual Service Insurance CompaniesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Hirst v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. LoveSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Cluett v. Medical Protective Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1992
- Doe Ex Rel Roe v. Madison Center HospitalIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. ShernowSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Bladen v. First Presbyterian Church of SallisawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.