Legal Opinion

Smith v. Johns Hopkins Community Physicians, Inc.

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 23, 2013No. 1191PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHARLES E. MOYLAN, JR. (Retired, Specially Assigned), J.

When more than one venue is legally proper for the trial of a ease, the possibility of transferring the case from a less convenient, albeit legally proper, forum to a more convenient forum has been a part of Maryland law since 1984. In that year the Court of Appeals promulgated Maryland Rule of Procedure 2-327(c),1 which provides:(c) Convenience of the Parties and Witnesses.—On motion of any party, the court may transfer any action to any other circuit court where the action might have been brought if the transfer is for the convenience…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Odenton Development Company v. LamyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  3. Brewster v. Woodhaven Building & Development, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  4. Johnson v. G.D. Searle & Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  5. Barufaldi v. Ocean CityCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2010

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re Adoption of Jayden G.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  2. University of Maryland Medical System Corp. v. KerriganCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
  3. Kulikov v. Baffoe-HardingCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  4. Scott v. HawitCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  5. HBC US Propco v. Fed. Realty Inv. TrustCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API