Legal Opinion
Redmond v. Republic Steel Corp.
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided January 26, 1956No. 23588PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By KOVACHY, PJ.
This is an appeal on questions of law from a judgment entered for the defendant-appellee in Common Pleas Court at the close of plaintiff’s case.
The defendant, The Republic Steel Corp., contracted with the Schweizer Dipple Company, a pipe and plumbing concern, for some pipe work in its building known as No. 2 Warehouse by writing out a “Purchase Order” on one of its standard purchase order forms as follows:
“REPUBLIC STEEL CORPORATION and Subsidiary Companies Purchasing Department Republic Building Cleveland 1, Ohio
The Schweizer Dipple Company 2161 E. 16th Place Cleveland,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Standard Oil Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Little v. HackettSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Charles v. . BarrettNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Braxton v. . MendelsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Bartolomeo v. Charles Bennett Contracting Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1927
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bennett v. WilsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1961
- Stinnett v. Halcore Group, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2006
- Gilmore v. Grandview Cement Products, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1962