Pankratz v. Hoff
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KONENKAMP, Justice.
[¶ 1.] In this land contract dispute, the circuit court found ambiguity in the contracts and admitted parol evidence to determine the parties’ intent. On appeal, we conclude that the contracts are enforceable as written. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.
Background
[¶ 2.] Doug Hoff, his wife Marlene, and his son Brian Hoff owned 9,334.71 acres in Perkins County, South Dakota, making up the “Hoff Ranch.” Of the total acreage, Doug and Marlene (the Hoffs) owned 8,200 acres, with the rest owned by Doug and Brian together, or Brian alone. After forty years of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Berg v. HudesmanWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- Alverson v. Northwestern National Casualty Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Enchanted World Doll Museum v. BuskohlSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- Neal v. MarroneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Ziegler Furniture & Funeral Home, Inc. v. CicmanecSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Donald White v. Sunoco IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- Detmers v. CostnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- Roseth v. RosethSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Roseth v. RosethSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Absolute Resolutions Investments, LLC v. Citibank, N.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 2024
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.