State v. Besola
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtOwens, J.
¶1 — The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution requires warrants to “particularly de-scrib[e] the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” That requirement is heightened if the warrant authorizes a search for materials protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. Stanford v. Texas, 379 U.S. 476, 485, 85 S. Ct. 506, 13 L. Ed. 2d 431 (1965). In this case, we are asked to evaluate a search warrant in a prosecution for possession of and dealing in depictions of minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct. For guidance, we look to a 1992…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Stanford v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- State v. RileyWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- United States v. Lee Cook and Jackie B. KirkCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- State v. PerroneWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- United States v. BurkeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
3Cited by9 opinions
- State of Washington v. Zachary James FairleyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
- State of Maine v. Christopher W. RoySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2019
- State v. VanceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- State Of Washington v. Eric Shawn ThomasCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- State Of Washington v. Jeffrey Isaac SchenckCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.