Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Md. v. USAFORM Hail Pool, Inc.
District Court, M.D. Florida
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SCOTT, District Judge.
FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, hereinafter called F. & D., sought a Declaratory Judgment to have its liability determined on a fidelity bond issued by it to certain named corporate insureds. Third parties not named in the bond but who claimed to have interests protected by the bond, intervened in the suit. This Court entered a summary judgment against the intervenors. Upon appeal, that ruling was affirmed. American Empire Insurance Co. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Md., 408 F.2d 72 (CA 5th 1969).
The bond was given to insure the named corporate insureds…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. CourtneySupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Magee v. Manhattan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- American Surety Company v. PaulySupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- American Empire Insurance Company of South Dakota v. Fidelity and Deposit Company of MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Citizens' Trust & Guaranty Co. v. Globe & Rutgers Fire Ins.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1915
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland v. Usaform Hail Pool, Inc., Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Three Garden Village Ltd. Partnership v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
- Bird v. Centennial InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross v. Usaform Hail Pool, Inc., Defendants-Appellees-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- Employer's Administrative Services, Inc. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.