McCutcheon v. Wozencraft
Texas Commission of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
McCBENDON, P.' J.
This was an action for mandamus by Currie McCutcheon and others, whom we will call relators, against Frank Wozencraft, mayor of the city of Dallas, and the several commissioners of that city in their official capacity, whom we will call respondents, to compel the latter to submit to the electors of the city at the next general city election a proposed ordinance granting to relators a franchise for the period of 20 years to operate over the streets of the city motor .bus lines'for the transportation of passengers for hire between points within the city and interurban bus lines…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Greene v. City of San AntonioCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
- McPhee & McGinnity Co. v. Union Pac. R.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
- Fifth Ave. Coach Co. v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
- City of Uvalde v. Uvalde Electric & Ice Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1923
- Greer v. Hunt CountyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- McCutcheon v. WozencraftTexas Supreme Court · 1927
- City of St. Paul v. Twin City Motor Bus Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
- Sitas v. City of San AngeloCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
- City of Beaumont v. Sam's Loan Office, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1930
- Atlanta Metro Leasing, Inc v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2020