Legal Opinion

New v. Smith

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 10, 1906No. 14,306PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from Greenwood district court; Granville P. Aikman, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

*175The opinion of the court was delivered by

Porter, J.:

This is a proceeding in error from a judgment sustaining a demurrer to a petition in which is also involved a ruling of the court requiring plaintiffs separately to state and number the different causes of action stated in the petition. The motion was allowed to the original petition, and the demurrer sustained to the amended petition. The subject-matter of the controversy in this action has been before the court in Smith v. Becker, 62 Kan. 541, 64 Pac. 70, 53 L. R. A. 141, and New v. Smith, 68 Kan. 807, 74 Pac. 610. The original petition…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. New v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  2. Smith v. BeckerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901
  3. Pierce v. BicknellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1873

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. New v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  2. New v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  3. McLaughlin v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1910
  4. New v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  5. Henry v. Gulf Coast Drilling Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API