Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Borisoff v. Workers' Compensation Board

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 12, 1990No. 88C-11352 CA A60630 (control), 88C-11350 CA A60631 and 88C-11323 CA A60632PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

In these separate mandamus proceedings, relators, who are injured workers, sought to compel the Workers’ Compensation Board to exercise its own motion jurisdiction to increase their permanent disability awards. In each case, the trial court issued an alternative writ of mandamus but dismissed the writ after considering its merits. We consolidate the appeals for opinion and affirm the trial court.

Each relator suffered a compensable injury. After the expiration of his aggravation rights under ORS 656.273, each petitioned the Board to exercise its own motion jurisdiction and award him additional…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. ClarkOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Hale v. Port of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Josephs v. BurnsOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Stone v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  5. Atlantic Richfield Co. v. GreeneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Harsh v. Harsco Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  2. In re the Marriage of ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  3. SAIF Corp. v. WheelerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  4. SAIF Corporation v. WheelerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API