Legal Opinion
SAIF Corp. v. Wheeler
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided January 8, 1992No. WCB No. 87-0276M; CA A64163PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtJoseph, C. J.
Claimant has petitioned for Supreme Court review. 107 Or App 254,811 P2d 1382 (1991). We treat the petition as one for reconsideration. ORAP 5.15.
Our decision was correct on the merits. ORS 656.278 clearly provides that the Board may terminate an award made before 1966. The more difficult question, raised for the first time in the petition for reconsideration, is whether we have jurisdiction to consider a petition for review of the Board’s order. We allow the petition in order to decide that issue.
ORS 656.278(3) provides:
“The claimant has no right to appeal any order or award made by the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Miltenberger v. Howard's PlumbingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
- State Ex Rel. Borisoff v. Workers' Compensation BoardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
- In THE MATTER OF MORTON v. Northwest Foundry and FurnaceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
- SAIF Corporation v. WheelerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
3Cited by1 opinion
- Liberty Northwest Insurance v. SamelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005