Legal Opinion

Montgomery v. Bouanchaud

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided February 26, 1934No. 32664PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OYERTON, Justice.

The plaintiff, in the suit of Norman Mayer & Co. v. Thomas W. Montgomery, caused a writ of fieri facias to issue from a judgment obtained therein, and seized, through the sheriff, an undivided half interest in two tracts of land in the parish of Pointe Coupee, described as lots 5 and 6 on a plot of Batanadle or Innis plantation, and also a third tract of land, consisting of 101.28 acres, and bordering partly on lot No. 5 of the foregoing plot.

The three tracts were seized as the property of the community, existing between Thomas W. Montgomery, the judgment debtor, and his…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fortier v. BarrySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1904
  2. Bachino v. CosteSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1883
  3. Knight v. KaufmanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1901
  4. Kentwood Bank v. McClendonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Betz v. RiviereSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1947
  2. Succession of SmithSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1965
  3. Cameron v. RowlandSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1948
  4. Slater v. CulpepperSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1957
  5. Curtis v. CurtisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1981

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API