Philco Radio & Television Corp. v. Damsky
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtHagarty, J.
This is an action in equity, brought to recover the purchase price of merchandise sold to the defendant administratoi;, to fix individual responsibility, and to impress liability upon the assets of the estate. The question presented involves the sufficiency of the complaint.
Briefly, it is alleged that one Abraham Damsky died intestate on the 27th day of March, 1934, leaving him surviving, as his only heirs at law and next of ldn, the defendants, all of whom are of full age and sound mind; that defendant Bernard Damsky, one of the sons and the duly appointed administrator of the estate,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Willis v. . SharpNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- O'Brien v. . JacksonNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
- Willis v. . SharpNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Saperstein v. UllmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
- Saperstein v. . UllmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In re the Estate of BlaszkiewiczNew York Surrogate's Court · 1962
- In re the Construction of the Will of BancroftNew York Surrogate's Court · 1949
- In re the Estate of DamskyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1940
- In re the Estate of O'BrienNew York Surrogate's Court · 1949
- In re the Estate of DamskyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.