Legal Opinion

Collins v. Martin

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 10, 1927No. Appeals, 9 and 10PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Kephart,

The claim of St. Agnes Hospital for the treatment and maintenance of indigent sick and injured, is based on the Appropriation Act of April 13, 1925; its payment was challenged as beihg an attempt to violate article III, section 18, of the Constitution, and the fiscal officers of the Commonwealth were restrained from paying. This appeal followed.

The Act of 1925, omitting unnecessary words, reads: “The sum of one million dollars ($1,000,000)......is ......appropriated to the department of welfare to pay for the treatment of the indigent sick or injured in medical…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Busser v. SnyderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. Glenn v. TreesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  3. Collins v. KephartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  4. Miller v. Central Trust & Savings Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Consumer Party of Pennsylvania v. Com.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Schnader v. LiverightSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  3. State Ex Rel. Caldwell v. PetersonNebraska Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Constitutional Defense League v. WatersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  5. Constitutional Defense League v. WatersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API