Legal Opinion
Joshim Uddin v. Attorney General United States
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided September 6, 2017No. 17-1056PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RENDELL, Circuit Judge:
Thé Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) found that Joshim Uddin, a citizen and native of Bangladesh, was ineligible for withholding of removal because he was a member of the Bangladesh National Party- (“BNP”), a major political party in his homeland. According to the Board, the BNP qualified as a Tier III terrorist organization under the Immigration and Naturalization Act (“INA”), 8 U,S.C. § 1182(a)(3)(B)(vi)(III). Thus, Uddin’s membership in the BNP rendered him ineligible for relief.
' While we will deny the petition for review challenging the Board’s ruling…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lin v. Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Alket Voci v. Alberto Gonzales , Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Hernan Gonzalez-Posadas v. Attorney General United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
- Sami Khan v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- Hussain v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Mazharul Islam v. Secretary, Department of Homeland SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021
- Thamotharam Thayalan v. Attorney General United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2021
- A.A. v. Attorney General United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
- Arturo Espichan v. Attorney General United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
- Ashish Sunuwar v. Attorney General United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2021
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.