Pacific Brokerage Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Evans, Judge:
This is an action against the United States in which the plaintiff seeks to recover a certain sum of money claimed to have been assessed in excess of the amount due as customs duties upon certain fish imported from Mexico and entered at Nogales, Ariz. The fish were entered as the products of American fisheries and claimed free of duty under the provisions of paragraph 1730 (a) of the Tariff Act of 1930. Plaintiff’s protest is in the following language:
Protest is hereby filed on your Re-Liquidation of March 10, 1937, covering C. E. (Free) No. 0220 of February 7, 1936.
The above…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- F. Vitelli & Son v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- United States v. LandramSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
3Cited by8 opinions
- Carey & Skinner, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956
- Protest 98751-K of Wah Shang Co.United States Customs Court · 1946
- Dorco Imports v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
- DuPouey v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941
- Border Brokerage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.