Legal Opinion

Mallehan v. Texas & P. Ry. Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 17, 1935No. 3259PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HIGGINS, Justice.

This is a suit by Mallehan against the Texas & Pacific Railway Company to recover damages for alleged breach of a contract of employment. Defendant’s general demurrer to the petition was sustained. The plaintiff declined to amend and the suit was disposed of upon such demurrer.

The petition is lengthy. The facts alleged and pertinent to the merits of the suit only need be stated.

There is a contract between appellee and the Association of Mechanical Department Employees which, inter alia, provides:

“Rule 36
“Grievances and Discipline
“(a) Should any employe subject to this…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Rentschler v. Missouri Pacific RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
  2. St. Louis, B. & M. Ry. Co. v. BookerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  3. Cross Mountain Coal Co. v. AultTennessee Supreme Court · 1928
  4. San Antonio & A. P. Ry. Co. v. CollinsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933
  5. Stolz v. WellsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wyatt v. Kansas City Southern Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  2. Fort Worth & Rio Grande Ry. Co. v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  3. Fort Worth & Rio Grande Ry. Co. v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  4. Wilburn v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas R. Co. of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
  5. Wilburn v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas R. Co. of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API