Denedo v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
1DissentStucky, Judge
I find myself in agreement with many of the points made by Judge Ryan in her able and scholarly dissenting opinion. I consider it established that we have coram nobis jurisdiction in cases in which the jurisdiction of the court-martial is at issue. The extent of our jurisdiction beyond this very limited area is questionable. However, even assuming that we have such jurisdiction, this is not a proper case for coram nobis relief. I would, therefore, deny the petition and do not find it necessary now to determine the extent, if any, of our jurisdiction beyond the circumscribed area set out…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Lockhart v. FretwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Mansfield, Coldwater & Lake Michigan Railway Co. v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.