Legal Opinion

Hinkle v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 18, 1913No. 4569PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Action for damages; from city court of Macon—Judge Hodges. October 26, 1912.

1Opinion of the CourtPottle, J.

The evidence authorized a finding that the plaintiff had been damaged by reason of unskilful surgical treatment by the defendant. Even if the instructions of the court to the jury which are complained of could be construed as submitting to the jury the issue, as to whether the defendant possessed reasonable surgical skill, they were not erroneous. The jury being authorized to find that the defendant failed to exercise a reasonable degree of care and skill, it is wholly immaterial whether the injury to the plaintiff resulted because the defendant did not possess reasonable skill as a surgeon,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Akridge v. NobleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Stephen W. Brown Radiology Associates v. GowersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  2. Kuttner v. SwansonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
  3. Mull v. Emory University, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  4. Bryan v. GraceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
  5. Chapman v. RadcliffeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API