McNamara v. Minnesota Central Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
The plaintiff in this action attempts to appeal from an order of the District Court of Steele County, granting a new trial. The case is fully stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Oowrt
Wilson, Ch. J.
The appellant is the owner of lands in Steele County, over which the defendant’s road was laid. Commissioners appointed under the statute to assess the damages occasioned by the location of the road, made their award, from which an appeal was taken to the District Court of said County, and in that Court the verdict rendered by the jury in the case was set aside, and a new trial ordered.
The appellant has attempted to remove the case to this Court by an appeal from the order granting a new trial.
When this order was made — Feb. 9, 1867, — it was not appealable, but the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Converse v. Burrows & PrettymanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1858
- Croswell v. CraneNew York Supreme Court · 1849
3Cited by11 opinions
- McDonald v. HoveySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- State v. HowardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- Voss v. SylvesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- Judkins v. TaffeOregon Supreme Court · 1891
- Lafayette & Indianapolis Rapid Railway Co. v. ButnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.