Legal Opinion · Dissent

State Ex Rel. Ohio Attorney General v. Shelly Holding Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 2012No. 2011-0252Published

1DissentLanzinger, J.

{¶ 46} I respectfully dissent. By affirming the judgment of the Tenth District Court of Appeals, holding that excessive air emissions occurring during a stack test conducted at a facility’s maximum capacity establish a presumption that a continuing violation exists, the majority allows the state a lesser burden of proof and disregards the defendants’ right to due process.

{¶ 47} After a lengthy trial and meticulous findings of fact, and as part of the total enforcement penalty of $350,123.52, the trial court assessed a civil penalty of $4,500 for Shelly’s admitted violations in the seventh…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ohio Valley Radiology Associates, Inc. v. Ohio Valley Hospital Ass'nOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State ex rel. Celebrezze v. National Lime & Stone Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State ex rel. Ohio Attorney General v. Shelly Holding Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API