Legal Opinion
Goldman v. Doe
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided March 27, 2013No. 12-CA-531PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERT M. MURPHY, Judge.
|2The plaintiff/appellant, Michael Goldman, appeals the trial court’s judgment granting the intervenor Founders Insurance Company’s motion for summary judgment, which held that the Founders insurance policy at issue does not provide coverage to any defendant named in appellant’s lawsuit and that Founders Insurance Company has no obligation to provide a defense to any defendant named in appellant’s lawsuit. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On July 30, 2010, the plaintiff/appellant, Michael Goldman, filed…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Smith v. Our Lady of the Lake Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
- Copenhaver v. John Bonura & Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1925
- Associated Motors, Inc. v. BurkLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
- Reynolds v. Select Properties, Ltd.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
- Mathes v. SchwingLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Guste v. LiretteLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
- Ioannis Maroulis Versus Entergy Louisiana, LLC, Sigur Construction, LLC, Ausi Builders & Construction, LLC, Hotel Investors, LLC, and Expotel Hospitality - Him, LLCLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2021