People v. Thomas S.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WIENER, J.
This appeal by a minor from an order committing him to the California Youth Authority (CYA) involves a facet of Arbuckle {.People v. Arbuckle (1978) 22 Cal.3d 749, 756-757 [150 Cal.Rptr. 778, 587 P.2d 220, 3 A.L.R.4th 1171]) not previously explored.
Arbuckle held that an implicit term of a plea bargain is the trial judge who takes the plea will also be the sentencing judge. {Id., at pp. 756-757.) In re Ray O. (1979) 97 Cal.App.3d 136 [158 Cal.Rptr. 550], applies the Arbuckle rationale to juveniles. Accordingly, absent a “clear waiver, whenever a juvenile enters a plea bargain…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- People v. PopeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- In Re TahlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Bunnell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- People v. ArbuckleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- In Re Mark L.California Supreme Court · 1983
- People v. RosaiaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- People v. PooleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Alcocer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- People v. James H.California Court of Appeal · 1985
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.