Legal Opinion

People v. Thomas S.

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 26, 1981No. Civ. 24228PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WIENER, J.

This appeal by a minor from an order committing him to the California Youth Authority (CYA) involves a facet of Arbuckle {.People v. Arbuckle (1978) 22 Cal.3d 749, 756-757 [150 Cal.Rptr. 778, 587 P.2d 220, 3 A.L.R.4th 1171]) not previously explored.

Arbuckle held that an implicit term of a plea bargain is the trial judge who takes the plea will also be the sentencing judge. {Id., at pp. 756-757.) In re Ray O. (1979) 97 Cal.App.3d 136 [158 Cal.Rptr. 550], applies the Arbuckle rationale to juveniles. Accordingly, absent a “clear waiver, whenever a juvenile enters a plea bargain…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People v. PopeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. In Re TahlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Bunnell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. People v. ArbuckleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  5. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. In Re Mark L.California Supreme Court · 1983
  2. People v. RosaiaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  3. People v. PooleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. Alcocer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  5. People v. James H.California Court of Appeal · 1985

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API