Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Forehand v. . Taylor

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 31, 1911PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal by defendant from Whedbee, J., at tbe April Term, 1911, of WayNE. The facts are sufficiently state'd in the opinion by Mr. Ohief Justice Cla/rh.

1Opinion of the CourtCiARK, C. J.

Tbis is an action which, was begun before a justice of the peace, under Revisal, sec. 3995, which is in chapter 88, providing for the establishment of drainage districts, and in subchapter 2 thereof. Said section 3995 provides:

“JIow amount of contribution for repair-.ascertained. . "Whenever there shall be a dam, canal, or ditch, in the repairing or keeping-up of which two or more persons shall be interested and receive actual benefit therefrom, and the duties and proportion of labor which each one ought to do and perform therefor shall not be fixed by agreement, or by the mode already in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Tyler v. . CapehartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
  2. Norfleet v. CromwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874
  3. Sanderlin v. LukenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  4. Adams v. . JoynerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  5. Staton v. . StatonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Shelton v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  2. Sanderlin v. . LukenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  3. Pasquotank Drainage District, No. 1 v. CahoonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  4. Shelton v. . WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  5. Norfleet v. . CromwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API