Legal Opinion

Norfleet v. . Cromwell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 5, 1874PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

All the facts pertinent to the points decided, are set out in the opinion of the Court.

The jury, upon the issues submitted to them by the presiding Judge, found a verdict for the plaintiffs. Judgment in accordance therewith, and appeal by defendant. 1. The Canal Law is unconstitutional. All lands in this country are held by tenure under the United States Government, and this secures to the land owner an estate free from all incumbrances, save those imposed upon it by the free will and act of the lawful owner thereof. 2 Kent, folio 240. By statute in this State, an estate in fee in the nature…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hoke v. . HendersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1833
  2. Barrow v. RichardNew York Court of Chancery · 1840
  3. Durham v. Cotton Mills.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  4. St. Andrew's Lutheran Church's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1871
  5. Tyler v. BeacherSupreme Court of Vermont · 1871

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ussery v. Branch Banking & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2015
  2. Runyon v. PaleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API