Camus v. Manatee County School Board

In this appeal, claimant Sandy Camus argues that (i) the judge of compensation claims (“JCC”) abused her discretion in excluding Dr. McGarahan’s medical opinion testimony relating to his September 21, *12672004 evaluation of claimant, and (ii) there is no competent substantial evidence supporting the portion of the JCC’s order finding that appellees employer/carrier (“E/C”) established a change in condition sufficient to modify the previous order of the JCC, which consequently eliminated their pre-existing obligation to provide claimant with attendant care. We agree with claimant that Dr.…