Gassaway v. . Gassaway Owen, Inc.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBarnhill, J.
The Workmen’s Compensation Act was designed and intended for the relief of injured workmen and employees earning a “weekly wage” and not for salaried executives. “The title and theory of the Act import the idea of compensation for workmen and their dependents.” Hodges v. Mortgage Co., 201 N. C., 701, 161 S. E., 220; Roberts v. Coal Co., 210 N. C., 17, 185 S. E., 438. Executive officers of a corporation are not, as such., its employees in the ordinary sense of the word and as it is used in this act.” Hodges v. Mortgage Co., supra. “When the president of a corporation acts only as such,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Molloy v. Chicago Rapid Transit Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1929
- Foster v. ShepherdIllinois Supreme Court · 1913
- Hodges v. Home Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Nissen v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- Jones v. Planters National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. VestalSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Henry v. A. C. Lawrence Leather Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Atkins v. . Transportation Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- Atkins v. White Transportation Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- Ervin v. Myrtle Grove PlantationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1945
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.