Legal Opinion

United States v. Kinley Thomas

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided April 16, 1993No. 92-3113PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the Court PER CURIAM.

2Per curiam

On appeal from his conviction for two counts of distributing cocaine base and one count of distributing heroin, Kinley Thomas challenges the district court’s order denying his motion to suppress tangible evidence. Thomas argues that the police officer’s affidavit in support of the application for a search warrant for Thomas’ house was inadequate because it offered no facts indicating that criminal activity occurred at the house. We affirm the district court’s ruling.

On June 27, 1991, Metropolitan Police Department officers applied for a warrant to search a…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Massachusetts v. UptonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. United States v. Candelario Angulo-LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  4. United States v. Kevin Dale RiedeselCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
  5. United States v. Libertad CruzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by67 opinions

  1. United States v. Yanokura F ElizCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
  2. United States v. Donald Miggins, Edward McDaniels and Charles Moore, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
  3. State v. TheinWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  4. United States v. Alex HodgeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
  5. United States v. Charles Lester VannessCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API