Legal Opinion

United States v. Donald Miggins, Edward McDaniels and Charles Moore, Jr.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided August 16, 2002No. 00-6708, 00-6709 and 01-5198PublishedCited by 131 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CLAY, Circuit Judge.

Defendants Donald Miggins, Edward McDaniels and Charles Moore, Jr. appeal from the respective criminal judgments entered against them arising from drug trafficking. Miggins challenges his sentence, while McDaniels and Moore claim that the district court erred in denying their suppression motions. For the reasons set forth below, we AFFIRM the district court’s judgments.

BACKGROUND

Defendants’ convictions and sentences arise from the controlled delivery on December 2, 1999 by the Nashville Metropolitan Police Department via Federal Express of a package from Los Angeles…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by131 opinions

  1. United States v. ManiganCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
  2. United States v. Christopher FrazierCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  3. United States v. Albert WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
  4. United States v. Jose Ruiz Solorio (01-5602) Ricky Martin Luna (01-5603) Delmas Dennis (01-5666) Marco Juarez (01-5667)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  5. United States v. Martedis McPhearsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006

126 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API