Gentry v. State
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Duckworth, Chief Justice.
1. Where, as here, the indictment is in two counts each charging the accused with the offense of murder, it is not incumbent upon the court to deal separately with each count in the charge to the jury. See Fry v. State, 141 Ga. 789 (82 S. E. 135); Nobles v. State, 98 Ga. 73 (26 S. E. 64); Stewart v. State, 58 Ga. 577; Dohme v. State, 68 Ga. 339; Williams v. State, 69 Ga. 11 (8); Berrien v. State, 156 Ga. 380 (119 S. E. 380).
2. It is only in cases where the State relies wholly on circumstantial evidence that Code § 38-109 must be charged without request. Nobles v.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Berry v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1851
- Georgia Power Co. v. PuckettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1882
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
- Ivey v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Jordan v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
- House v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
- McGruder v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
- Ledford v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
- Yarn v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.