Legal Opinion

Sears, Roebuck & Company, Petitioner-Cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent-Cross-Petitioner

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided February 19, 1992No. 546, Dockets 91-4117, 91-4145PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MINER, Circuit Judge:

Petitioner-cross-respondent Sears Roebuck & Company seeks review of a National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) order directing Sears to bargain with the union certified as the representative of Sears’ automotive employees at its Maplewood, Minnesota store, after a certification election. The NLRB found that Sears had committed an unfair labor practice in violation of section 8(a)(5) and (1) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 158(a)(5) and (1), by refusing to bargain with the union. The NLRB cross-petitions for enforcement of its order. Sears contends that its…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Ara Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. Lorimar Productions, Inc., Lorimar Productions, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  3. Nightingale Oil Company v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  4. National Labor Relations Board v. Parsons School of Design a Division of the New School for Social ResearchCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board, Petitioner-Cross-Respondent v. The Twin City Hospital Corporation, Respondent-Cross-PetitionerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
  2. UPS Ground Freight, Inc. v. N.L.R.B.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API