Legal Opinion

Nelson v. Fontenot

District Court, E.D. Texas

Decided March 5, 1992No. 1:91CV240PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT HOWARD’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

SCHELL, District Judge.

CAME ON TO BE CONSIDERED, Defendant, Stephen C. Howard’s, Motion for Summary Judgment. After considering the motion, the response, the pleadings, the exhibits, and the affidavits, this court is of the opinion that as a matter of law Stephen C. Howard is entitled to a partial summary judgment, and defendant’s motion is, therefore, GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.

FACTS

Plaintiffs are all deputies with the Orange County Sheriff’s Department and were members of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Griffin v. BreckenridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America, Local 610 v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Massey v. Armco Steel Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1983

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Applied Capital, Inc. v. GibsonDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2007
  2. Bieros v. NicolaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Bieros v. NicolaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API