State Ex Rel. Swope v. Mechem
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SEYMOUR, Justice.
The question for decision arises in an original proceeding in mandamus against respondent, the Governor of New Mexico. Petitioners are three district judges appointed by respondent or his predecessors; petitioners Swope and Harris were appointed pursuant to 1949 legislative act increasing by one the number of judges in the second and fifth judicial districts respectively, and petitioner Bonem was appointed pursuant to a 1951 statute providing for an additional judicial district and judge, i. e., the tenth judicial district. 1941 Comp. § 16-304.
All ran and were elected in the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State ex rel. Shaw v. WareOregon Supreme Court · 1886
- State ex rel. Smith v. AskewSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1886
- State ex rel. Whitney v. JohnsOregon Supreme Court · 1869
- Clark v. State, ex rel. GravesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
- State ex inf. Major v. AmickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1912
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Seidenberg v. New Mexico Board of Medical ExaminersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1969
- State Ex Rel. Lee v. HartmanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
- In Re Removal of ThaxtonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
- King v. RaphaelsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2015
- Matheson v. FerryUtah Supreme Court · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.