Legal Opinion

In Re Relford

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Indiana

Decided April 26, 2005No. 95-AKM-13PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON DEBTOR’S OBJECTION TO CREDITOR ECAST SETTLEMENT CORPORATION’S PROOF OF CLAIM

JAMES K. COACHYS, Bankruptcy Judge.

This matter came before the Court on the Shirley Relford’s (the “Debtor”) Objection to eCast Settlement Corporation’s (“eCast”) Proof of Claim. The Court, having reviewed the parties’ respective briefs, now issues the following Order, wherein it finds eCast’s Proof of Claim to be deficient but, nevertheless, denies the Debtor’s request to disallow it. ECast is, instead, given 30 days to file an amended claim to cure the defects described below. 1

Facts

On December 2, 2003, the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In the Matter of William J. Stoecker, Debtor. Appeal of Thomas E. Raleigh, as Chapter 7 Trustee for the Estate of William J. StoeckerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  2. Frietsch v. Refco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
  3. In Re CluffUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 2004
  4. In the Matter of Andrea I. Reese, Also Known as Andrea I. Reece, Debtor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  5. In Re ShankUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2004

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Heath v. American Express Travel Related Services Co. (In Re Heath)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  2. In Re MinbatiwallaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2010
  3. In Re BurkettUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2005
  4. In Re PorterUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 2007
  5. B-Line, LLC v. Kirkland (In Re Kirkland)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 2007

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API