In Re Shank
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION ON OBJECTIONS TO PROOFS OF CLAIM
PAUL W. BONAPFEL, Bankruptcy Judge.
Following confirmation of her chapter 13 plan, the debtor objected to nine unsecured proofs of claim on the ground that they did not have documents to support them as required by Rule 3001 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure and Official Form 10. Two claimants responded to the objection, contending that the debtor cannot object to claims after confirmation of her plan and that, in any event, their claims are allowable as filed. The other claimants did not respond.
Six of the proofs of claim (several…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Gardner v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- In Re Benjamin Pierce Simmons, Bankrupt. Benjamin Pierce Simmons v. J.T. SavellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- In Re International Horizons, Inc., Debtors, United States of America v. International Horizons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- James W. Adair v. Michael L. Sherman and Sherman & ShermanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- In Re South Atlantic Financial Corp., Etc., Debtors. Biscayne 21 Condominium Association, Inc. v. South Atlantic Financial Corp., Etc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Heath v. American Express Travel Related Services Co. (In Re Heath)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- In Re BurkettUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2005
- In Re PlourdeBankruptcy Appellate Panel of the First Circuit · 2009
- In Re TaylorUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2007
- In Re SackoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.