Legal Opinion
Lockett v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
Decided May 18, 1994No. 05-92-00064-CRPublishedCited by 94 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON RECONSIDERATION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
MALONEY, Justice.
We withdraw our opinion of December 17, 1993. The following is now the Court’s opinion.
The trial court convicted Donald Eugene Lockett of aggravated robbery, found the enhancement paragraph true, and assessed a fifty year sentence. In six points of error, appellant claims that: (1) the evidence is insufficient to support his conviction; (2) the indictment is void; (3) his confinement in the same cell with Lamar James Cole could have been conspiracy; (4) the State cannot charge two different parties with…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hernandez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Bigley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by94 opinions
- Dusek v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1998
- Billey v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1995
- Cobb v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2002
- Ortiz v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1999
- Lucero v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1996
89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.