Legal Opinion

People v. Camp

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 7, 2004No. 2-03-1271PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McLAREN

Defendant, William Camp, was charged with driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI) (625 ILCS 5/11 — 501(a)(2) (West 2002)). After discovery began, defendant moved to dismiss the charge, arguing that he could not receive a fair trial because the State had lost a videotape of his field sobriety tests. The trial court dismissed the charge with leave to reinstate should the tape be recovered. The State appeals (see 188 Ill. 2d R. 604(a)(1)), contending that the dismissal was an excessive sanction for the inadvertent loss of the tape. We agree. Therefore, we reverse the judgment and remand the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. First Capitol Mortgage Corp. v. Talandis Construction Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1976
  3. People v. NewberryIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Thorne v. Department of Public SafetyAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
  5. People v. KoutsakisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. JamesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  2. People v. KladisAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
  3. People v. KarimAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
  4. People v. AronsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
  5. People v. MoravecAppellate Court of Illinois · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API