Legal Opinion

Village of Lansing v. Sundstrom

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 1942No. 26498. Decree affirmedPublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Farthing

The single question presented on this appeal is whether in a suit by a municipality to foreclose the lien of a special assessment, the holders of the special assessment vouchers or bonds issued in anticipation of the collection of the special assessment, are necessary parties. This question arose by a motion of the defendant property owner to dismiss the foreclosure complaint filed in the circuit court of Cook county on the ground of a lack of necessary parties, the overruling of this motion by the court, defendant’s election to stand on her motion, and the entering of a default judgment…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rothschild v. Village of Calumet ParkIllinois Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Conway v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. Lake Street Elevated RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Texas Company v. HollingsworthIllinois Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Monahan v. City of WilmingtonIllinois Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. The People v. AndersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Schreiber v. County of CookIllinois Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Zurich Insurance v. Baxter International, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  4. Benjamin v. Estate of BarthAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  5. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad v. Harris Trust & Savings BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API