Schmalz v. Buckingham Township Zoning Board of Adjustment
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Benjamin R. Jones,
These appeals raise the problem of the reasonableness, hence the validity, of a section of a zoning ordinance which provides for a 50 foot set-back of property in a wholly agricultural district.
Charles Schmalz and Ida J. Schmalz, his wife, (hereinafter termed appellants) have owned property since before 1951 on Mechanicsville Road, Buckingham Township, Bucks County. This property consists of approximately 9 acres of land located in a wholly agricultural and rural community. An examination of the Zoning Map of Buckingham Township indicates that, with the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Truax v. CorriganSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- White's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Archbishop O'Hara's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- National Land & Investment Co. v. Easttown Township Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Schubach v. SilverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Cleaver v. Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Exton Quarries, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Anstine v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.