Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Teeter

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 18, 2008No. 2005 WDA 2005PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

STEVENS, J.:

¶ 1 Defendant Jeffrey Teeter appeals from the judgment of sentence entered after a jury convicted him of possession with intent to deliver cocaine (“PWID”), criminal use of a communication facility, possession of a controlled substance, corruption of minors, and possession of drug paraphernalia, charges stemming from his intended sale of drugs at the residential driveway of a 17-year-old buyer. Sentenced to not less than three years or more than six years’ incarceration on PWID,1 Teeter first claims the trial court erred in imposing an additional two year mandatory…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Commonwealth v. BellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Commonwealth v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Commonwealth v. BongiornoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  5. Commonwealth v. DouglassSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GoldsboroughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. Commonwealth v. GarzoneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. Commonwealth v. CleggSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. Estate of FridenbergSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  5. Com. v. Harper, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API