Olmstead v. Meyers
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Berrien; Bridgman, J. Bill by Melbourne H. Olmstead against William 0. Meyers and another to foreclose a mortgage. Complainant filed a petition for a deficiency decree, which was dismissed. Petitioner appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, C. J.
February 10, 1902, the circuit court in chancery handed down a decree of foreclosure in a suit between the parties hereto, decreeing that there was due to the complainant from defendant William C. Meyers, upon certain notes and mortgages, the sum of $5,119.24, and ordering the defendant to pay this sum on or before February 20, 1902, and in default the mortgaged premises be sold, and containing the usual orders in a foreclosure. The decree also provided that, if upon such sale there should be a deficiency, the said commissioner should specify the amount thereof in his report of sale—
*699“And that…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Knickerbocker v. WilcoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Blair v. ComptonMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
- Peck v. CavellMichigan Supreme Court · 1867
- Love v. WoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
- Lymburner v. JenkinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.