Legal Opinion

Eason v. Samson Lodge No. 624, A. F. A. M.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 5, 1959No. 4 Div. 978PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STAKELY, Justice.

The question for decision is whether the doctrine of prescription applies in this case.

The bill in this case was filed by Samson Lodge, a body corporate, and James W. Al-pin, as Worshipful Master, L. R. Collins, as Senior Warden, and Sam Owens, as Junior Warden, of the aforesaid Lodge as complainants. Under the provisions of § 4 of the General Acts of 1859-1860, p. 458 et seq., the principal officers of each subordinate lodge under the jurisdiction of the grand lodge and their successors in office are created a body politic and corporate so as to enable them and each of their…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. McArthur v. Carrie's Adm'rSupreme Court of Alabama · 1858
  2. Kidd v. BorumSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  3. Oxford v. EstesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  4. Coyle v. WilkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
  5. Romanchuk v. PlotkinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ballenger v. Liberty National Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
  2. Jemison v. BelcherSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  3. Schwab v. NonidezSupreme Court of Alabama · 1964
  4. Ballenger v. Liberty National Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API