Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part
DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL RIGHTS Ex Rel JOHNSON v. SILVER DOLLAR CAFE
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided September 29, 1992No. 91348, (Calendar No. 3)Published
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBoyle, J.
I agree with Justice Levin that the scope of review to be used by the circuit court in reviewing the decision of the Civil Rights Commission is review de novo as expressly provided both in the constitution1 and in the statute.21 write separately to state that I cannot agree that, in this instance, the circuit court reviewed the Civil Rights Commission decision de novo. In that respect I agree with Justice Riley.
i
The full factual background is uniquely relevant to the claims of emotional distress, mental anguish, and humiliation. Mary Johnson began3 working as a waitress for the owners of the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Sparks v. SparksMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
- Eide v. Kelsey-Hayes Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1988
- Precopio v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
- Beason v. BeasonMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.