Legal Opinion

Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Henley

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 2002No. 01-1822PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondent, Gerald C. Henley of Cleveland, Ohio, does business as Henley Investment & Development Corporation and Henley Educational Consultants. Respondent is not a lawyer.

In October 1999, respondent consulted with Willie L. Moore, Jr., about perceived discriminatory practices by Moore’s employer. As a result of that consultation, respondent wrote to the employer indicating that he was not a lawyer but wanted the employer to resolve this “very serious racial discrimination matter prior to this matter becoming a full blown case in Federal Court.” Enclosed with the letter, copies of which were…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. CromwellOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. MooreOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Geauga County Bar Ass'n v. CanfieldOhio Supreme Court · 2001

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. CaseyOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Foreclosure Solutions, L.L.C.Ohio Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Lorain Cty. Bar Assn. v. Zubaidah (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Ohio State Bar Assn. v. Burdzinski, Brinkman, Czarzasty & Landwehr, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API