Legal Opinion
Ohio State Bar Assn. v. Burdzinski, Brinkman, Czarzasty & Landwehr, Inc.
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided December 27, 2006No. 2006-0839PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.
{¶ 1} In this matter, on objections to the final report of the Board on the Unauthorized Practice of Law, we are asked to determine whether consultations and other services by nonlawyers in labor negotiations are the unauthorized practice of law.
I
{¶ 2} Respondent Burdzinski, Brinkman, Czarzasty & Landwehr, Inc., is a management-side labor consulting firm incorporated in 1988. Respondents Bernard Burdzinski II and Connie Brinkman-Burdzinski are shareholders and directors of the respondent corporation.
{¶ 3} As labor-relations consultants, respondents assist their clients in interactions with…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Goldfarb v. Virginia State BarSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Amalgamated Ass'n of Street, Electric Railway & Motor Coach Employees of America v. LockridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Lodge 76, International Ass'n of MacHinists & Aerospace Workers v. Wisconsin Employment Relations CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ohio State Bar Assn. v. MillerOhio Supreme Court · 2014
- Gibbons v. Ohio State Dental Bd.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022
- Disciplinary Counsel v. Spicer (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
- Lawson v. Mahoning Cty. Mental Health Bd.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2010