Legal Opinion
Milligan v. Gilmore Meyer Inc.
District Court, S.D. Georgia
Decided October 3, 1991No. CV 490-272PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
EDENFIELD, Chief Judge.
Before the Court is the motion of the defendant, Resolution Trust Corporation (“RTC”), for summary judgment based on the federal common law’s D’Oench, Duhme doctrine and 12 U.S.C. § 1823(e) (1988). As explained below, the Court agrees with RTC’s position and GRANTS summary judgment in its favor. Also pending is the motion for summary judgment of the defendants William W. Shear-house Jr. and Friedman, Haslam, Weiner, Ginsberg, Shearhouse & Weitz, now known as Weiner, Shearhouse, Weitz, Greenberg & Shawe (“the Weiner firm”). Because this Court’s jurisdiction was…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Bill Clark Herbert Futch Austin Hurst Louis Sliker and William Barrineau v. Coats & Clark, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. Ford Mall Associates Ltd. PartnershipDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1992
- Dal-Tile Corp. v. Cash N' Go, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997