Gray v. Gray
North Dakota Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court of Cass County, Góle, J. Plaintiff appeals from an order requiring her to comply with the provisions of a final decree of divorce. The court, under the showing made, is not justified in making the order; and, second, that the order is one that does not appeal and cannot appeal to the equitable side of this court.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the District Court of Cass County, Góle, J. Plaintiff appeals from an order requiring her to comply with the provisions of a final decree of divorce. The court, under the showing made, is not justified in making the order; and, second, that the order is one that does not appeal and cannot appeal to the equitable side of this court. See Rindlaub v. Rind-laub, 19 N. D. 353; Rindlaub v. Rindlaub, 28 N. D. 168. The adjudication as to the real property and the lien cannot be modified by this court. See A. D. Baker Co. v. Booher, 153 Wis. 319; Blake v. Blake, 35 N. W. 551; Hamilton v.…
1Opinion of the Court
Christianson, Oh. E.
On the 27th day of April, 1916, a judgment was duly entered in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant in a divorce action. In that judgment it was, among other things, ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the defendant should pay to the plaintiff $2,500, in lieu of the homestead situated in Casselton, in Cass county in this state, within thirty days after the entry of the decree of divorce; and that, upon payment of said sum, the plaintiff should execute and deliver to the defendant a quitclaim deed releasing any and all right, title, interest, and claim in and to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Mansfield v. HillOregon Supreme Court · 1910
- Scott v. ScottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
- Rindlaub v. RindlaubNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
- Rindlaub v. RindlaubNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
3Cited by1 opinion
- Leifert v. WolferNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1946